Addressed to the Doritos of Club Penguin & CPA Community,
At 1:06 PM EST today, the CPA administration contacted DCP leadership regarding an alleged incident in which an ACP member was supposedly “doxxed” by someone in DCP. As a result, the administration informed us that ACP was given the option to end the war, an offer they immediately accepted, eager to escape their defeats.
First and foremost, let’s address the individual at the center of this accusation. This person had joined DCP only a day before the alleged “doxxing” took place, asking us to “just give him a rank.” However, before participating in any battles or meaningful interactions, he abruptly left without notifying any leaders, only to quietly return to ACP and regain his rank. The timing of these events is highly suspicious. He switched sides just before ACP ran to the administration with accusations against DCP. It raises serious questions about his intentions. Was this a deliberate setup? Given how quickly ACP used this claim to avoid further conflict, it certainly seems that way.
Now, let’s break down why this situation does not, by any reasonable definition, qualify as doxxing. Doxxing is the act of maliciously obtaining and exposing private or personally identifying information. However, in this case, the ACP member in question had his own face as both his profile picture and banner, making his appearance publicly available to anyone who viewed his profile. Not only that, but his Instagram (where his images are openly accessible) was linked directly to his account. The so called “doxxing” image was taken during a public voice chat in which his camera was on, where multiple people were present, and he had already shared it himself across various group chats. There was nothing private, secretive, or remotely malicious about this situation.
To put this into perspective, consider our leader, BSchar (Ben). His face is also public, his profile picture feature his appearance, and he frequently joins voice chats with his camera on. Yet, nobody has ever accused ACP of “doxxing” Ben when his image is shared or referenced. So why is this ACP member being treated differently? Why is the standard suddenly shifting when it benefits ACP? This clear double standard exposes the biased and illogical nature of the accusation.
It is absurd to claim that a new recruit, who spent a mere day in DCP before returning to ACP, was suddenly “doxxed” just as ACP realized they could not win on the battlefield. This reeks of an orchestrated attempt to manipulate the situation and secure an easy way out of a war they were losing. If they couldn’t defeat us through skill, they would resort to deception instead.
Equally baffling is the administration’s justification for enforcing this decision. They argue that two DCP staff members failed to condemn the sharing of a screenshot from a public call, as if that somehow justifies handing ACP a force treaty. Since when does silence equal wrongdoing? Are armies now expected to police casual conversations and public screenshots with absolute scrutiny, or does this expectation only apply when it’s convenient for ACP? The inconsistencies here are glaring.
Given these circumstances, we categorically reject the administration’s ruling and refuse to acknowledge this as a loss. Instead, we recognize this war as a 2-0 victory for DCP. We outright deny ACP’s claims, calling them for what they truly are, baseless, dishonest, and nothing more than a desperate attempt to escape their inevitable defeat. DCP will not be manipulated by underhanded tactics, and we stand firm in rejecting this fabricated narrative.
Fear the Shield.
Joel, Aisha, BScharbach2, Kira
DCP Main Leaders
Filed under: Doritos Army |
What the fuck happened?!